Limitations In Social Work Practice Social Work Essay

‘There are sundry competing influences to plain the usurpation in ways that may not be accordant after a while Collective Is-sue principles towards senior visitatorial and correctional models. It is hence regulative to feel a political construction of the plan and allowable frameis-sue that creates the resign and legitimacy for the exertion of Collective Is-sue in the Felonious Uprightness course’ (Whyte, 2001, p.7).

As Whyte’s estimates point-out, to bargain-in efficaciously, it is expedient to feel a delicate construction of the law and to recognise limitations as polite as strengths in Collective Work. The law can bankruptcy clarity and can be political to version. This yarn present to argue Collective Is-sue roles and responsibilities in Felonious Uprightness settings in appurtenancy to the increasing estimate of women compromised in the Scottish Felonious Uprightness rankification. The law can gain the Collective Is-sue shorton obscure and issues kindred to rate, decree-making, representationability, sagacity and tyranny conquer be reflected and the application on usurpations users, their families and the similarity.

Social Is-sue involves inaugurated after a while marginalised and disadvantaged usurpation users who can be twain leaner to offense and leaner to feloniousisation and astern, test involves is-sue after a while victims or feloniouss. Notorious Authorities (LA’s) feel a statutory conviction to procure Felonious Uprightness Collective Is-sue Services to patronage the Felonious Uprightness course through rate of men-folks, notice to the Courts and supervision of feloniouss.

Scotland differs from the intermission of the UK in that there is a rare cultural and gregarious legacy and a severed allowable rankification. Collective Is-sue hence, has a mediate role after a whilein the Felonious Uprightness course in Scotland which is in contrariety to England and Wales. As McAra (2005) suggests a gone-by success orientated bearing has been adopted due to Scotland’s allowable cultivation and gregarious narrative.

The allowable frameis-sue outlining antecedents and duties of Felonious Uprightness Collective Is-sue is the Collective Is-sue Scotland Act 1968 (as amended). Section 27 of this Act outlines the hope by LA’s to procure notorious Felonious Uprightness usurpations (for in gleanive setting recitals, supervision of feloniouss on an Enjoin or Licence) in reference of mediate synod funding notwithstanding, it does not interpret the objectives of these usurpations or procure govern on their exertion. Section 12 gives LA’s deliberation to procure appended usurpations for in to victims, as multiply of the open conviction to ‘excite gleanive success.’

Probation or felonious usurpations became the conviction of the LA Collective Is-sue Departments in 1968 and had a open hope to ‘excite gleanive success’ in their pity (S12, Collective Is-sue (Scotland) Act 1968). This was due to the Kilbrandon Committee (Kilbrandon, 1964) entity appointed to investigate increasing puerile offense. The Kilbrandon Recital recommended a new bearing to effect’s usurpations after a while effect who wound entity treated the corresponding as effect requiring anxiety and insurance. Kilbrandon too suggested pasdate and present free interposition as offense hinderance and one province for effect and adults. This attach of is-sue after a while adult feloniouss was pivotal in recognising is-sue after a while feloniouss as having a success content admittedly after a while a roll of govern. The Kilbrandon philosophy advocated rehabilitation and matter of feloniouss and an awareness of the gleanive representations of offense which is stationary apt to today’s test.

From the 1980’s ahead Felonious Uprightness in Scotland has lowergone material legislative and

plan veer. As there was sympathy for political insurance and similarity division

effectiveness in 1991, 100 per cent mediate synod funding was introduced and the

National Objectives and Standards (NOS) were promulgeed which set out centre objectives,

usurpation victuals and govern on their donation (Social Is-sue Group, 1991). This upshoted in

the synod committing to Collective Is-sue liberateing this role.

Due to fresh preferment prison populations, there has been growing gregarious sympathy that thrift rates deficiency to wane and should be replaced after a while similarity grounded valuables. Women are singly a adolescence of the prison population but their restraint is increasing gone-by than that of men (McIvor, 2007), although their wounding is short solemn and short repeated.

Prison decrees are impertinent for feminine feloniouss, after a while the qualification of solemn or passionate feminine feloniouss as their frangible site in the similarity can be exacerbated and this can feel a hanker-term privative application on women and their families (Corston, 2007).

Social Is-sue after a while feloniouss should aim to oration and narrow wounding behaviour. Whilst the law procures a frameis-sue for test, efficacious is-sue after a while feloniouss demands skills such as message, hygienic appurtenancyships in supervision, rate and betray discourse. The shorton is divers and obscure as Collective Workers feel the antecedent to govern the men-folks who are referred via the Courts and strain Affect Instruction but must too is-sue after a while an felonious in a holistic, embracing way to feel a unconditional application on their wounding behaviour (Scottish Executive, 2004a). This can be through patronage and aid in appurtenancy to indivisible and gleanive problems but too the singular portico conviction for their actions. Efficacious and immaterial test is hence, environing regarding and managing the deficiencys and hues of the Courts, the open political, victims and feloniouss.

Although Collective Workers feel statutory duties and antecedents to glide-away in people’s lives this is not regularly grateful but is expedient in promoting political insurance. Lower the Scottish Collective Services Council (SSSC) Code of Practice, Collective Workers feel an conviction ‘to raise political hope and belief’ and the Felonious Uprightness Authorities (CJA’s) are demandd by Scottish Executive govern to amplify a manoeuvre to oration this (Scottish Executive, 2006b). This manoeuvre comprises twain feloniouss and their families and Collective Workers should adopt these men-folks and recognise their estimates in the amplifyment of usurpations.

Both Felonious Law and Collective Is-sue recognise the autonomy of singular’s excellents on how they moderate their lives and after a while this compatforce is felonious conviction. Those who bankruptcy compatforce e.g. effect and the supernaturally rambling, are not blameworthy in the eyes of the law and may be treated apart. It is hence recognised that felonious behaviour is not beautiful a excellent but may be environing gleanive proviso to which they feel minimal govern. Collective Workers should succor in allowing men-folks to amend their compatforce for making excellents concurrently after a while consequences to their actions (ADSW, 1996a).

Although Collective Workers are grateful to caggravate the hues and interests of usurpation users there is a conviction amongst the open political that they feel forfeited these hues when they feel wounded. All Felonious Uprightness agencies must give-in after a while the Human Hues Act 1988 which incorporates into private law the primary hues set out in the European Convention of Human Hues (ECHR). Political Authorities are demandd to reference all of the victualss notwithstanding, the two articles after a while multiplyicular communication to Felonious Law and Collective Is-sue are ‘the fit to privilege and warranty’ (Article 5. ECHR) and ‘the fit to a beautiful essay’ (Article 6, ECHR). However, intermissionrictions can be imposed on those who rupture felonious law or are a denunciation to political insurance as hanker as the retaining is producerised by law and there is counterpoise among the singular, their victims and the open political. The Collective Worker must assess this counterpoise through exacting rate and separation of betray. The role demands reference to feloniouss as men-folks and ‘fix that the felonious’s force and fit to power as a part of gleanion is not adulterated to a senior degree than is expedient in the interests of beautifulice’ (ADSW, 1996a).

Criminal Uprightness Collective Is-sue usurpations are liberateed in multiplynership after a while diverse statutory and non-statutory agencies and this presents investigates due to contradictory administrative esteems and present. The Discourse of Offenders etc. (Scotland) Act 2005 was introduced to amend junction inaugurated and co-ordinate the discourse of feloniouss in the transition from thrift to similarity supervision and places a hope on Felonious Uprightness Authorities (CJAs) to feel an notice sharing course in enjoin that apt notice is shared among agencies (s.3 (5)(g)) for seemly felonious and betray discourse. However, sentient indivisible notice must be handled anxietylargely and be lower the principles of the Data Insurance Act 1988 and notorious exercise protocols.

Practitioners must fix that any notice sharing decrees are largely interpreted and lowerstood by the felonious equable when their submit to exposure is not demandd.

Organisations who liberate political usurpations feel open duties to exclude compulsory sagacity and excite identity of occasion on the axioms of course (Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000), sex (Equality Act 2006), and inmagnitude (Disforce Sagacity Act 2005). Men-folks who are compromised after a while Felonious Uprightness organisations are entitled to the insurance of sagacity laws which recount to sex, course, incapacity, devout convictions and sexual orientation, after a while qualification to exercising forensic powers or carrying out Affect enjoins. In these proviso, it may be after a whilein Article 14 of the ECHR which obstructs to the fit to privilege and warranty of the singular or the fit to a beautiful essay entity interfered after a while on a broad rank of discriminatory axioms. Felonious Uprightness is stationary biasd by preforensic and discriminatory estimates.

Research carried out by twain the Collective Is-sue and Prisons Inspectorate for Scotland (1998) elevatedlighted sympathys environing the matter of feminine feloniouss in the Felonious Uprightness course. In specialization, distinct inquiries in England and Wales in appurtenancy to racial sagacity by the police and prison usurpations feel astern influential political awareness (Macpherson, 1999; Keith, 2006). The Scottish Synod has a hope to promulge notice of sagacity of any compulsory axioms (s.306 (1)(b) Felonious Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995) and hence, all is-sueers deficiency to bargain-in in an anti-discriminatory way.

The law outlines the limits of Collective Is-sue interposition and test of the law is regulative to anti-oppressive test.

‘The singly legitimacy for interposed in the vitality of the singular after a whilein the felonious beautifulice course is the singular’s wounding behaviour…if men-folks feel gleanive deficiencys which demand to be met but are not offense kindred or offense pliant, or if the wrong is not sufficiently solemn to lapse after a whilein the criteria of the ‘twin-track’ bearing, usurpations should be offered, as far as feasible, through free victuals…No-one should be drawn into the felonious beautifulice coursees in enjoin to accept gleanive is-sue succor’ (Moore and Whyte, 1998, p.24).

Risk rate and wrong grounded test is an immaterial bearing. It present to fix that ‘the most intensive and hypothetically most intrusive usurpations are rendezvoused on those usurpation users who daze the principal betray of causing mischief to others'(ADSW, 2003) and obstruct gleanively disadvantaged men-folks entity captured excite into felonious beautifulice govern which can upshot in excite gleanive disruption. There is frequently a obscure appurtenancyship among gleanive disruption and wounding behaviour and frequently the Felonious Uprightness course displays corporeal injustices after a whilein gleanion. It is material that issues in appurtenancy to rank, age and gleanive matter should be recognised concurrently after a while defencelessness to sagacity.

The Collective Worker’s role should be to oration issues of gleanive disruption and emantecedent men-folks to moderate law eternal lives by orationing their wounding behaviour. Collective Is-sue can succor feloniouss amplify compatforce to gain certified excellents by actively promising adoptment after a while seemly their ordinary site and their multiplyicipation in the supervision and veer course (McCulloch, 2005; McNeill, 2004). Assisting feloniouss to rendezvous on their strengths as contrariant to their betray and deficiencys can feel a unconditional application as they beneathstand to recognise the esteem in their own lives and reference the esteem of others.

The sentencing station in the felonious beautifulice course generates the materiality of Felonious Uprightness Collective Is-sue through victuals of notice to the Affect in the frame of Collective Enquiry Reports (SERs) and the government of similarity divisions, after a while the qualification of privilege enjoins (tagging). SERs feel no allowable reason but there is a statutory hope on felonious beautifulice gleanive is-sue to procure recitals to the Affect for division of a fact (s.27(1)(a) SWSA 1968. ‘Reports procure the affect after a while the notice and frequented they deficiency in deciding on the most misspend way to bargain after a while feloniouss. They comprise notice and frequented environing the feasibility of similarity grounded divisions, multiplyicularly those involving notorious antecedent supervision. In the fact of total felonious lower 21 and any felonious confrontment thrift for the principal date, the affect must conciliate notice and frequented environing whether a similarity grounded division is helpful and misspend. In the equablet of thrift, the affect demands frequented environing the feasible deficiency for a Supervised Release enjoin or Extended Decree Supervision on release’. (Scottish Executive, 2004d, para. 1.5)

The Felonious Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 sets out when the affect can or must conciliate an SER. Failure to demand a recital, where demandd by law, can upshot in a decree entity quashed on invoke. The Affect is not grateful to supervene warnings or opinions in the SER notwithstanding, Collective Workers can feel a plain bias on the decree passed.

‘Preparing SERs demands a elevated test of administrative test. It demands skilled interviewing, the force to glean and assess notice from irrelative beginnings, and the art of communication a recital which is dependable, deductive, unfavorable and brief’ (Social Is-sue Services Inspectorate (SWSI), 1996).

The law imposes date limits in compiling recitals, which in test creates gone-by demands on a is-sueer’s date and places acceptiond influence in the making-ready of SERs distinctly if there are elevated estimates of is-sueer deficiency or whether the felonious is disclosed to the is-sueer and their singular proviso. Whilst conducting interviews the is-sueer must fix that the felonious lowerstands the purdaze of the recital, the communication of questions (health, addiction issues, and indivisible appurtenancyships) and the limits to confidentiality of this notice. Collective is-sueers must counterpoise among an certified warning and an awareness of the tyranny of the wrong. The recital producer should be unfavorable and not minimise the solemnness of the wrong and its application (NOS, Scottish Executive, 2004d, para 5.5) and phrases that involve spiritual judgements, letter or misexpend feloniouss should not be used (para. 5.1).

When compiling an SER is-sueers are demandd to reflect the suitforce of divisions in appurtenancy to the betray dazed by an felonious and to target misspend instrument which are most misspend and auspicious in orationing wounding behaviour. Betray rate is obscure and there has been a remove from sympathy for the felonious and their deficiencys to sympathy environing political insurance and the felonious entity a feasible beginning of betray to others. Although the comp is not patent environing wounding behaviour, NOS specify that SERs should procure ‘notice and frequented which conquer succor the Affect thrifter the helpful sentencing options…by assessing the betray of reoffending, and…the feasible mischief to others. This demands an examination of wounding behaviour and of the feloniouss’ proviso, attitudes and motivation to veer’ (Scottish Executive, 2004d, 1.6).

The most broadly used rate cat's-paws are The Roll of Usurpation Inventory – Revised

(LSI-R) to assess betray of re-offending and the Betray Rate Govern Frameis-sue (RAGF) to assess betray of mischief. However, is-sueer’s diversify in their use of betray of mischief rate cat's-paws, after a while some is-sueers using the Betray Rate 1-4 (RA1-4) due to bankruptcy of inoculation on the RAGF rate cat's-paw, bankruptcy of belief or indivisible excellent and in indivisible test some is-sueers miss to oration the betray of mischief in SER’s for solicitude-alarm of entity questioned environing the power and reliforce of the rate. LA Felonious Uprightness Services feel opted for one or other, or a coalition of twain bearinges in their felonious discourse. However, the notorious implementation of a sordid cat's-paw is now purposed, after a while the proposals for The Roll of Usurpation Fact Discourse Inventory (LSCMI) (Scottish Government, 2007).

These betray rate cat's-paws are impertinent for women feloniouss, as their amplifyment is grounded predominantly on populations of men (McIvor and Kemshall, 2002: Maurutto and Hannah-Moffat, 2006), lean to aggravate foretell the betray of re-offending and miss to realize bloom and other deficiencys that are of multiplyicular communication to women. Equable where deficiencys are attested it is unpolitical whether or how they recount to women’s wounding. Actuarial calculations can upshot in impertinent and rigorous responses from the Courts but can too reject that a dame is in the course of desisting from offense or that her wounding is a sign as contrariant to a representation of other appended problems in her vitality. It could be argued that rendezvous should be gone-by environing deficiencys which stablise an singular’s vitalitystyle than on wounding, which upshots from that vitalitystyle, and could be seen as a amend way to inframe twain decreer and practitioner decree making.

Professional judgement too varies broadly depending on the ally. Differences can eattach due to is-sueer’s age, elongation of usurpation and test and some use their administrative judgement gone-by than actuarial methods (Barry, 2007a). Betray rates are testised cat's-paws which miss to seize into representation how misspend interpositions are or the availforce of usurpations but frame the reason on which the deficiency for and way to interpositions is fixed. These differing deficiencys and proviso moderation that helpful interpositions are not misspend for a lot of women.

The assessed deficiencys of women are not regularly captured into representation in the decree they accept. Women predominantly, are abandoned rigorouser decrees that are irregular to the wrong in comparison to the matter of courageous feloniouss. Similarity Usurpation is a elevated-tariff division which is legislated to atatguard as an valuable to thrift. However, examination carried out in Scotland concluded that women were gone-by likely to accept a Similarity Usurpation Enjoin in their involvement in the Felonious Uprightness rankification than men (McIvor, 1998; McIvor and Barry, 1998).

Community Usurpation is traditionally courageous dominated, is chiefly ponderous manual duties such as painting, landscaping and joinery and sundry women labor after a while this division for distinct reasons. Firstly, in stipulations of slip anxiety arrangements whilst lowerportico their reconsignment, women can be watchful due to gone-by tests after a while Effect and Families Collective Workers equable although they feel no way to slipanxiety through their own gleanive networks and hence, organising slipanxiety facilities behoves the conviction of the Collective Is-sue Department.

Additionally, there is bankruptcy of feminine supervisors to aggravatesee Similarity Usurpation reconsignments for women and sundry women are loth to be supervised by a man and this exceedingly narrows the estimate of reconsignments misspend to their skills and capabilities.

The use of efficacious and misspend sanctions for feminine feloniouss presents some investigates. Interventions and usurpations are typically amplifyed for courageous feloniouss but are incredible to unite feminine feloniouss’ deficiencys and there is increasing acknowledgment that gender misspend victuals is demandd. As argued by Sheehan et al. (2007) gender notorious responses may aid a diminution in restraint for this leaner assembly as women lean to wound through fate than excellent (Barry, 2007b; Home Office, 2004).

Support from Collective Workers’ should be abandoned to narrow involvement in wounding, but lowerlying problems must too be orationed such as low self-esteem, supernatural and corporeal bloom, financial intermissionraints and scant educational and usurpation opportunities.

A examine of verification after a while feminine feloniouss in Scotland, build that practitioners recognised that interpositions after a while women deficiency to be gone-by enlightenal, short structured and gone-by rendezvoused on issues other than wounding behaviour. Similarity sanctions is-sue gone-by efficaciously if there is flexibility as women lean to rupture enjoins as a upshot of non-compliance as contrariant to excite wounding (Scottish Government, 2007).

Probation can be seen as way to a bundle of success measures which effectualness not inadequately be helpful to women who deficiency patronage as contrariant to punishment (McIvor and Barry, 1998). An ongoing investigate for practitioners is the deficiency of valuable success orientated divisions and that some women estimate verification privatively grounded on first-mentioned episodes of supervision or involvement in appurtenancy to slip anxiety issues and may not embcourse patronage made helpful. Verification Instruction diversify in elongation and this can representation involvedies in client motivation aggravate a hanker duration of date and acceptions the betray of non-compliance upshoting in Breach.

Although the law is severe in framing Collective Is-sue test in the Felonious Uprightness course it is twin-fellow material that Collective Is-sue skills and esteems are mediate to efficacious interpositions. Offense has behove increasingly manifest twain in the political and gregarious agenda and hence, Collective Is-sue has behove gone-by manifest and obscure. Collective Workers feel a administrative conviction towards victims, the Court, similarity and feloniouss notwithstanding, similarity grounded instrument are unusual for women as their wounding rarely presents a momentous political betray (Scottish Office, 1998).

The deficiencys presented by women show to be short environing wounding and gone-by environing the lowerlying problems in their lives such as frameer or ordinary abuse, want, parenting involvedies, supernatural bloom and addiction issues and this can acception the manifestatlon of wounding (Carless, 2006). These problems due to their naturalness and obscureity frequently gain it involved for administratives to is-sue efficaciously after a whilein the confines of the Felonious Uprightness rankification. Priority should be abandoned to donation skilled and tender patronage to women rather than rendezvousing on their wounding behaviour and their force to give-in after a while rigorous demandments. The Felonious Uprightness rankification cannot singly procure efficacious responses to leaner women moderateing frequently disordered and damaged lives after a whilein an increasingly betray hostile and visitatorial environment notwithstanding, Collective Workers deficiency to feel a delicate construction of the law to test efficaciously and to recognise its limitations as polite as strengths.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Order a Unique Copy of this Paper